How Accurate Was SAP on All Non HANA Databases Being Legacy?
Executive Summary
- What SAP said about all non-HANA databases being legacy?
- The truth about all non-HANA databases being legacy?
Video Introduction: What SAP Said About All Non-HANA Databases Being Legacy?
Text Introduction (Skip if You Watched the Video)
SAP frequently stated that HANA was so much better and so much more innovative than any other database that customers should begin replacing already installed databases with HANA. One of the marketing messages used by SAP was to claim that all databases that were not HANA were legacy. This is because according to SAP no database could ever compete with HANA. Years later, you will learn how accurate SAP was in this claim.
Our References for This Article
If you want to see our references for this article and other related Brightwork articles, see this link.
Notice of Lack of Financial Bias: We have no financial ties to SAP or any other entity mentioned in this article.
- This is published by a research entity, not some lowbrow entity that is part of the SAP ecosystem.
- Second, no one paid for this article to be written, and it is not pretending to inform you while being rigged to sell you software or consulting services. Unlike nearly every other article you will find from Google on this topic, it has had no input from any company's marketing or sales department. As you are reading this article, consider how rare this is. The vast majority of information on the Internet on SAP is provided by SAP, which is filled with false claims and sleazy consulting companies and SAP consultants who will tell any lie for personal benefit. Furthermore, SAP pays off all IT analysts -- who have the same concern for accuracy as SAP. Not one of these entities will disclose their pro-SAP financial bias to their readers.
The Truth About All Non-HANA Databases Being Legacy?
As covered in the article, What is the Actual Performance of HANA? there is no evidence that HANA is faster than other competing databases such as Oracle 12c, IBM Blu, or MS SQL Server. And as covered in the article HANA as a Mismatch for S/4HANA and ERP, HANA performs worse than previous versions of these competitors for transactions and processing intensive functions such as running MRP. One cannot introduce a database that performs worse than databases (mainly if it offers not other advantages) that preceded them and call those databases “legacy.”
It is illogical.
Conclusion and Calculation
SAP receives a 0% accuracy rating for its use of the term legacy to describe all databases.
Link to the Parent Article
This is one of many research articles on a specific topic, that support a larger research calculation. For the overview of the research calculation for all of the SAP topics that were part of the study, see the following primary research A Study into SAP’s Accuracy.