How Big Tech Has Censored the 9-11 Documentary Loose Change

Table of Contents: Select a Link to be Taken to That Section

Executive Summary

For many years a documentary called Loose Change provided strong evidence against US goverment’s story on 9/11.
This video has been pushed down in search results and videos that falsely contradict it have been pushed up.

Introduction

For many years one could find the documentary Loose Change, which provides ample evidence questioning the US government’s explanation of 9/11 without any suppression or made up videos that denigrate Loose Change. However, when looking for Loose Change again to send to some friends, I noticed a difference from when I searched in the past. First, the documentary is no longer in the top search results in YouTube. The only way that can happen is through YouTube suppressing the video. Secondly, other videos that say that Loose Change is false, but without providing any evidence has been pushed higher in the search results.

This shows the coordination between the US government and Big Tech to censor and suppress all explanations of events that the US government does not agree with. Orwell has come to Big Tech in a major way.

Reviewing the Top Search Results for Loose Change

Notice that the top search results for “loose change documentary” does not include the documentary, but includes both irrelevant results and videos that say that Loose Change is completely false.

The first video is titled 16 Acres Official Trailer. This is a trailer for a movie about the politics of rebuilding on the site of the World Trade Centers. This is not what people are looking for when they type “loose change documentary,” and YouTube/Google know that.

Later in the search results I found this video — produced by Inside Edition — which is a tabloid network. Why would Inside Edition be a source on this topic?

Furthermore this short video makes the false claim that none of the evidence provided in Loose Change meant anything, and that the entire popularity of Loose Change was due to slick production values. A further false claim is that most of the argument is not being done with words but with images.

I have watched Loose Change probably five times, and would not be tricked by a documentary that was just images. Inside Edition — which tends to cover the Kardashians states authoritatively that the “hunger for conspiracy theories has only grown.” Why is the information provided in Loose Change a conspiracy theory? What is the evidence presented in Loose Change?

It is amusing to hear Inside Edition claim that Loose Change, a very well substantiated documentary lacks substance, when Inside Edition is the US Magazine of television news.

Another result pushed above the actual documentary is a National Geographic documentary that proposes a computer model that is meant to prove that the building fell completely normally.

Again, the only way this video could be pushed above the Loose Change documentary in a search result requesting the Loose Change documentary is if YouTube deliberately pushed it upward.

23 Result Down on the Search Result Page

The actual documentary is the 23rd result down on the page. The US government cannot answer the questions posed in this documentary. Therefore, they need it to discredited. Maybe watching it is dangerous and an example of thoughtcrime.

Loose Change on Rumble

For comparison, I checked another video sharing site called Rumble. Rumble shoed Loose Change as the first search result as it should be. It also did not show any of the false videos seeking to undermine Loose Change. This means that Rumble did not participate in the government’s censorship plan for the documentary.

What Was the Outcome of 9/11

9/11 was used to immediately pass the Patriot Act, to justify invading Afghanistan and Iraq, and the Neocons planned to invade 1/2 of the Middle East. Looking at Afghanistan and Iraq and the $4 trillion spent and millions killed, didn’t that end well?

How could anyone question the wisdom and honesty of George W Bush and the Neocons?
When were Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Pearl, Condoleezza Rice ever caught lying about anything?
Obviously they are a reliable source of information on what happened, and shouldn’t we all just trust the official story presented by these fantastic individuals of the highest integrity?

And that is who brought us the official story. Why then is the story considered unassailable?

Conclusion

Big Tech and the US government have decided that Loose Change needs to be suppressed. This is against the 1st Amendment, as it is not only Google doing this as a private company, but the US government colluding with Big Tech to censor speech and to keep people from watching what they want to watch and getting the information the US government does not agree with.