How Covid Vaccine Manufacturers Used the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization to Unblind Their Studies

ByPrimary Researcher

Executive Summary

  • The vaccine manufacturers used a trick after receiving their EUA from the FDA.
  • They unblinded the studies, which ruined them for long-term study.

Introduction

Clinical trials are supposed to be blinded. However, after receiving the Emergency Use Authorization, the drug companies unblinded the study, which prevented the study from validating longer term (greater than two months) adverse reactions.

Our References for This Article

If you want to see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.

Go to top

The Unblinding That Was Done

Members also expressed concern that an emergency use authorization could undermine the ongoing clinical trial meant to gather critical data about the experimental vaccine over a longer period. In the vaccine trials, some test subjects are given the experimental vaccine and others are given a placebo—a harmless fake. To make the experiment as objective as possible, neither the test subjects nor the medical personnel interacting with them are supposed to be told who is in which group. In other words, they are supposed to be “blinded.”

One vaccine developer, Pfizer, has stated that if it received an emergency use authorization, it would have an ethical obligation to tell test subjects about it and allow those receiving the placebo to switch to the vaccine. That could drain the clinical trial of placebo subjects and unblind all who remain involved in the study.

Some members said they opposed issuing emergency use authorizations, at least under certain scenarios. – POGO

Ethical Obligation, Or A Drug With Dangerous Side Effects That Need To Be Hidden?

This term “ethical obligation” has been used many times in the past and was used again by Dr. Fauci to stop the long-term testing of Remdesivir, which is a deadly drug. This is covered in the article How Gilead Brought Off the NIH’s Support of Remdesivir.

Billions of people would eventually take these vaccines. Don’t they have the right to know about vaccine adverse events? What about the ethics of having data on vaccine safety (much less effectiveness) so that they have informed consent? No. According to the drug companies, they had an “ethical obligation” to stop their study from being able to test the adverse reactions of 18,000 or so people in the control group.

Anytime “ethical obligation” is used as logic for ending a clinical trial early, one can be assured that the drug has dangerous side effects.

And now, in retrospect, what do we know about the covid vaccines? They are the most dangerous vaccines ever introduced. This is shown by analyzing the adverse reaction databases of the CDC and the WHO. However, when people with strong analytical skills who are not part of the medical establishment use this database to show the high side effects of the covid vaccines, they are told they should not be looking at the database, as is covered in the article, The Medical Establishment Resents the Calculation of Risk Using VAERS.

Addressing the Damage

One of the best ways to address the damage caused by the covid vaccines is with Ivermectin. This is the reason I began taking Ivermectin -- before investigating all the other health benefits of the drug. Now, I take Ivermectin for many reasons.

  • We have Ivermectin dosage calculators based on research studies and for all the different uses of Ivermectin.
  • We are the only web source offering an Ivermectin dosage calculator in addition to different dosage estimates for different cancer types.
  • All of our calculators are easy to use (see our dosage calculator listing). Each person enters their personalized information into the calculator and receives our recommended extensively researched dosage estimate automatically and immediately calculated.
  • We also cover the broader problems with dosage calculation in medicine at the article The Problem With Dosage Calculation in Medicine, as this is an issue much larger than for one drug. 

About Our Ivermecting Testing Program and Recommended Ivermectin Source of Supply

  • We performed pharmaceutical testing on Ivermectin to find a lower-cost version that also matched Merck's original Ivermectin in bioequivalence.
  • You can read about the details of our Ivermectin testing in this article, Our Ivermectin Bioequivalence Testing.
  • We got Summit Products to carry this version of Ivermectin, which passed our bioequivalence testing.