How Google Facebook and Twitter Censored Accurate Information on Covid to Promote The Vaccines

Executive Summary

• As more information has come to light, Big Tech’s censorship on covid is overwhelming.

Introduction

Many powerful entities, including medical authorities, pharmaceutical companies, media, and Big Tech, engaged in censorship to push people to become vaccinated without informed consent. This article describes how this was accomplished.

Our References for This Article

To see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.

Google’s Censorship on the Topic of  the Vaccines

As were performed research into covid, we found clear censorship on the part of Google on the topic of adverse reactions and deaths from the vaccine.

Observe what I typed in Google’s search box. “Gene-based vaccines are killing people global research.” 

Comparing Censoring Search Engines Like Google to Non-Censoring Search Engines Like Duck Duck Go

I also typed in the name of the website I wanted, Global Research. However, Google returned not that website article but instead “fact-checking” websites contradicting the article.

I checked DuckDuckGo, which is not known for censoring results. The results are not “fact-checking” (fact-checking has become a euphemism for establishing discrediting ideas and information that challenge the status quo and is usually more accurate than the information from establishment sources). However, still, where is the Global Research article?

I found the article by going directly to the Global Research website and typing in the search there. Here is a screenshot of it.

This article, which two very popular search engines were not interested in me reading, said the following.

For example, in 1976, the U.S. government vaccinated 45 million people against pandemic swine flu. The entire program was canceled after reports of just 53 deaths, according to Fox News. Note: The number of deaths reported after the 1976 inoculation program varies from three to 53, depending on the source.5,6,7

Now, health authorities are shrugging off more than 3,800 deaths8 after COVID-19 vaccination as either coincidental or inconsequential. Think about that. Five months into the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, we’re looking at a death toll that is 7,000% greater than during the swine flu vaccination campaign, which was canceled after the vaccine was deemed too risky.

The COVID-19 “vaccine” is also on a level of magnitude more dangerous than the seasonal flu vaccine. As reported by McCullough, on average, there are 20 to 30 deaths reported
following the seasonal flu vaccine, which is given to about 195 million Americans each year.9 Compare that to these novel COVID-19 gene therapies. So far, an estimated 124 million

Americans are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and the death count is already at 3,837, as of April 30, 2021.10

A third comparison can be made against vaccines as a whole. As reported by Tucker Carlson, 15May 6, 2021, the COVID-19 shots have already resulted in more deaths than all available vaccines combined from mid-1997 until the end of 2013 — a period of 15.5 years.

In a recent report, the Israeli People Committee (IPC), a civilian body of health experts, similarly concluded that “there has never been a vaccine that has harmed as many people.” The Committee received 288 reports of death following COVID-19 vaccination, 90% of which occurred within 10 days. According to this report (translated from Hebrew):

February 19, 2021, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a statement saying there were “no safety problems” with Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA injections.17 Of the 113 deaths reported at that time, none was deemed to be related to the vaccines. Then, in May 2021, after reviewing 1,600 deaths reported to VAERS with an unnamed group of U.S. Food and Drug Administration doctors, the CDC declared that none of the deaths was related to the vaccine — this despite 24% of deaths have occurred within 48 hours of injection, and 16% within 24 hours. The problem is that it would take several months to investigate that many deaths, so the likelihood that this was a thorough investigation is slim to none.

The reason you’re not hearing any negative news about these “vaccines” is because major media networks and stakeholders in COVID-19 vaccines have formed a “trusted news credibility coalition” that seeks to prevent any negative information about COVID vaccines to get into the popular media “because they’re concerned about vaccine hesitancy,” McCullough says.

The system is clearly failing if every single report of serious injury or death, including all the ones occurring within hours and in people with no underlying health problems, are simply written off as coincidence. It’s simply not believable.

Of these, Pfizer’s mRNA injection accounted for the largest number of deaths at 4,293, followed by Moderna with 2,094 deaths, AstraZeneca with 1,360 deaths and Johnson & Johnson with 19 deaths. As noted by McCullough: – Global Research

Yes, this all seems like information the governments and the pharmaceutical industry would not want the public to know as it may increase “vaccine hesitancy.” This goes beyond pushing results down. Google has de-indexed the article.

We Are Not The Only Ones Noticing the Search Engine Censorship

Interestingly, this issue of censorship is addressed in an article by Global Research, from which I took the following quotation.

I have found that the suppression of any articles questioning the official narratives that isn’t presented as “fake news” is almost virtually complete in my own Google searches. This means one must know before one searches the actual name of the post you are looking for or of the name of an alternative independent media site like Global Research or OffGuardian, because it appears that Google will now routinely use its algorithms to do everything in its power to avoid taking you to anything but articles and sites supporting the official narratives.

We now live in a world in which MSM outlets across all platforms routinely refuse to publish general articles, opinion pieces, video interviews, or even reference peer reviewed scientific journal articles by world renowned scientists if that material diverges from the official CDC/WHO opinion and stated policy.One cannot help but note the rather seamless nature of this entire propaganda operation.It is indeed impressive from a prospective of totalitarian narrative control. – Gary Weglarz

The Pharmaceutical Company, Medical Establishment, Media, and FDA’s Deceptive Emergency Use Authorization

The media continually stated that the vaccines had been “approved” when they had received only an EUA. In their announcement, the FDA made several false claims.

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued the first emergency use authorization (EUA) for a vaccine for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older. The emergency use authorization allows the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to be distributed in the U.S.

“Today’s action follows an open and transparent review process that included input from independent scientific and public health experts and a thorough evaluation by the agency’s career scientists to ensure this vaccine met FDA’s rigorous, scientific standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality needed to support emergency use authorization. – FDA

It is not clear that the process was transparent. Like all drug trials submitted to the FDA, they are performed by the pharmaceutical company and their subcontractors and only show the information and the problems they want. That is the opposite of transparency. Furthermore, the FDA lacks rigorous scientific safety or effectiveness standards. They approved vaccines with a roughly 1% improvement versus covid. Even that improvement was rigged as numerous analyses by non-FDA individuals with expertise in these areas question whether the data in these studies was concocted. Secondly, if the FDA is so confident, why did they issue only an EUA rather than full approval? 

The totality of the available data provides clear evidence that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine may be effective in preventing COVID-19. – FDA

There is no evidence that this vaccine does this. Even the published information shows a 1% improvement versus covid.

The data also support that the known and potential benefits outweigh the known and potential risks, supporting the vaccine’s use in millions of people 16 years of age and older, including healthy individuals. In making this determination, the FDA can assure the public and medical community that it has conducted a thorough evaluation of the available safety, effectiveness and manufacturing quality information. – FDA

That is impossible. Pfizer hid the adverse reactions, and the FDA had no idea if the vaccine was safe.

This has also been censored, and the media has deliberately conflated the idea of approval with Emergency Use Authorization.

Google and Twitter As Vaccine Propagandists

I checked six pages down in the search results and never found it. It should be the top result. Not only was the web page not there (and it is not as if Global Research is not a popular website), but it was page after page of search results promoting vaccine technology. It was as if Google had deliberately converted my search results into the opposite viewpoint. So Google is not only censoring but also serving a propaganda function.

Twitter also decides what you have the right to see. However, I thought Twitter just managed a social media platform, since when are they the experts on what is true and what is not? Fear not; they have partnered with companies with financial ties to pharmaceutical companies (which they do not disclose). This way, Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, and The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation will help police “misinformation” that might reduce their profits. The Gates Foundation pays Facebook to do the same thing. 

How the US Government Paid Media to Only Run Positive Covid Coverage

This quote is from the article Feds Secretly Paid Media to Promote COVID Shots.

The Biden administration made direct payments to nearly all major corporate media outlets to deploy a $1 billion taxpayer-funded outreach campaign designed to push only positive coverage about COVID-19 vaccines and to censor any negative coverage.

Media outlets across the nation failed to disclose the federal government as the source of ads in news reports promoting the shots to their audiences.

According to a Freedom of Information Request filed by The Blaze, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) purchased advertising from major news outlets including ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox News, CNN and MSNBC.

HHS also ran media blitzes in major media publications including The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, New York Post, BuzzFeed News, Newsmax and hundreds of local TV stations and newspapers across the nation.

In March 2021, Congress appropriated $1 billion U.S. tax dollars for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to spend on activities to “strengthen vaccine confidence in the United States,” with $3 billion set aside for the CDC to fund “support and outreach efforts” in states through community-based organizations and trusted leaders.

In addition to direct payments, the Biden Administration reached out to Big Tech to fight “covid misinformation,” which amounted to censoring anything that did not agree with the false information provided by the pharmaceutical companies about the vaccines.

Many journalists have complained about their inability to criticize dangerous pharmaceutical products, and to my knowledge, Tucker Carlson is the only individual with a mainstream platform who has (occasionally) spoken out against the industry. In recent times Big Tech and Big Pharma (who during Obama’s presidency became the core sponsors of the Democrat Party) have financially merged with each other, and like the media Big Tech now has a similar commercial interest in protecting Big Pharma’s monopoly.

Conclusion

The pandemic brought about one of the great examples of elite censorship in world history. These entities conspired to provide a false picture of the risks of covid. They drove billions of people to become vaccinated with dangerous and ineffective vaccines that cost billions of dollars to pharmaceutical companies and those with investments and financial conflicts with pharmaceutical companies.

Addressing the Damage

One of the best ways to address the damage caused by the covid vaccines is with Ivermectin. This is the reason I began taking Ivermectin -- before investigating all the other health benefits of the drug. Now, I take Ivermectin for many reasons.

• We have Ivermectin dosage calculators based on research studies and for all the different uses of Ivermectin.
• We are the only web source offering an Ivermectin dosage calculator in addition to different dosage estimates for different cancer types.
• All of our calculators are easy to use (see our dosage calculator listing). Each person enters their personalized information into the calculator and receives our recommended extensively researched dosage estimate automatically and immediately calculated.
• We also cover the broader problems with dosage calculation in medicine at the article The Problem With Dosage Calculation in Medicine, as this is an issue much larger than for one drug. 

About Our Ivermecting Testing Program and Recommended Ivermectin Source of Supply

• We performed pharmaceutical testing on Ivermectin to find a lower-cost version that also matched Merck's original Ivermectin in bioequivalence.
• You can read about the details of our Ivermectin testing in this article, Our Ivermectin Bioequivalence Testing.
• We got Summit Products to carry this version of Ivermectin, which passed our bioequivalence testing.