How The CDC Rigged the Count of Adverse Reactions From The Covid Vaccines With A 14 Day Lag

ByPrimary Researcher

Executive Summary

  • The CDC has lied throughout the pandemic, creating an endless series of falsified statistics on COVID-19.
  • We cover their fake 14-day lag.

Introduction

This article covers how the CDC adjusted statistics to place adverse reactions from the vaccines on the unvaccinated.

Go to top

How the CDC Rigged the Count of Adverse Reactions from the Vaccines: Setting Up a 14 Day Lag

The CDC has constantly produced fake statistics since the beginning of the pandemic; as they did with the H1N1 or swine flu pandemic, they were unsuccessful in turning in the pandemic that they wanted back in 2009.

The following quote explains yet another false statistic produced by the CDC to create pandemonium.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, you’re not counted as fully vaccinated until a full 14 days have passed since your second injection in the case of Pfizer or Moderna, or 14 days after your first dose of Janssen, despite the fact that over 80% of deaths after the vaccines occur in this window. How convenient.

Anyone who dies within the first 14 days post-injection is counted as an unvaccinated death. Not only does this inaccurately inflate the unvaccinated death toll, but it also hides the real dangers of the COVID shots, as the vast majority of deaths from these shots occur within the first two weeks

The CDC also has two different sets of testing guidelines — one for vaccinated patients and another for the unvaccinated. If you’re unvaccinated, CDC guidance says to use a cycle threshold (CT) of 40, known to result in false positives. If you’re vaccinated, they recommend using a CT of 28 or less, which minimizes the risk of false positives.

The problem with this is that over 80% of hospitalizations and deaths appear to be occurring among those who have received the jabs, but this reality is hidden by the way cases are defined and counted. A really clever and common strategy of the CDC during the pandemic has been to change the definitions and goalposts so it supports their nefarious narrative.

For example, the CDC has quietly changed the definition of “vaccine,” apparently in an attempt to validate calling the COVID mRNA gene therapies vaccines. In an August 26, 2021, archived version of the vaccine, the CDC defines it as a “product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.” – Global Research

This means that this is just one of many reasons that both the deaths from covid and the deaths from adverse reactions were inaccurate. Another reason is that there has never been an accurate test for covid.

This is one of the ways the CDC created a “pandemic of the vaccinated.”

The CDC is constantly lying about covid data. This video illustrates how the CDC manipulates data to show precisely whatever it wants to show the public. 

This same issue is covered in the following video. The establishment media never explains how the CDC rigs the data it releases to deceive the public. 

The CDC’s Suppression of Its Internal Experts

This is explained in the article Vaccine Whistleblower William Thompson.

CDC scientists colluded to cover up a relationship between the timing of the MMR vaccine and autism in African Americans that was first discovered in November of 2001. Rather than reporting the results to the public, all data regarding this relationship were destroyed at a secret meeting held some time in August/September of 2002. This fact has been affirmed via an affidavit given by Dr. Thompson to Rep. Bill Posey in September, 2014. Dr. Thompson attempted to warn the CDC Director at the time, Dr. Julie Gerberding, regarding this relationship, prior to the February 2004 Institute of Medicine meeting on vaccines and autism. Rather than allowing Dr. Thompson to present the information at this meeting, Dr. Gerberding replaced him as a speaker with Dr. Frank Destefano, current director of the CDC’s Immunization Safety Office, where he presented fraudulent results regarding the MMR vaccine and autism.

Dr. Thompson was put on administrative leave and was threatened that he would be fired due to “insubordination.” Dr. Thompson has published two papers linking thimerosal exposure in infant vaccines to tics in boys (Thompson et al. 2007 and Barile et al. 2012). CDC fraudulently maintains on their website that “There is no evidence of harm caused by the low doses of thimerosal in vaccines, except for minor reactions like redness and swelling at the injection site.” (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimerosal/).

The tic result was also affirmed in the earlier CDC publication by Verstraeten et al. (2003) and the Andrews et al. (2004) publication. CDC also pressured Dr. Thompson to withhold publication of his 2012 paper which reported a relationship between thimerosal and tics. Dr. Ed Travathan, head of the CDC’s National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, stated in an April 27, 2009 memo to him that the analysis was sound except for the tic results and that they should be omitted from the publication. Since the tic result was the only result that had a consistent negative relationship with thimerosal exposure, it seemed that Dr. Thompson’s superiors were specifically concerned that thimerosal’s safety and use not be questioned.

CDC Financial Conflicts: Who Does the CDC Report To?

Well, it’s certainly not the US public. Let’s see if this quote from the article Who Owns the CDC can give you a hint.

Unfortunately, the CDC also does its best to obfuscate its funding by only stating if they receive more or less than 50,000 from each sponsor (this is somewhat analogous to how processed food manufacturers do their best to hide information from nutrition labels). For example, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is simply stated as a party that donated over 50,000 dollars.

Fortunately, unlike many of the sponsors, the Gates Foundation does disclose the grants they have given the CDC, which for reference totaled to:

•9.73 million in 2022
•10.84 million in 2021
•6.70 million in 2020
•15.60 million in 2019
•18.13 million in 2018

Thus, the CDC’s disclosures were accurate since each of these figures was “50,000 and above,” although I would argue they were quite misleading, as these figures clearly demonstrate sufficient bribery to override any pre-existing scientific integrity at the agency.

The CDC lies as much about its donors as it does about vaccines!

Pfizer’s Donations

•2.8 million in 2021
•5.4 million in 2020
•6.24 million in 2019
•4.13 million in 2018

GAVI’s Donations

GAVI is the vaccine alliance.

•27.71 million in 2021

•13.17 million in 2020

So really — how independent is the CDC from vaccine manufacturers?

Gilead

Gilead produced Remdesivir, which was included as a main part of the covid protocol and is one of the most deadly drugs in existence.

•10.95 million in 2019

Conclusion

The CDC deliberately adjusted how the COVID deaths were counted to make it appear that the vaccinated were not vaccinated and so that deaths from adverse reactions to the vaccines looked like COVID deaths. This is so they could present a false storyline to the public to promote vaccination and maximize profits to their customers, the pharmaceutical companies.

Addressing the Damage

One of the best ways to address the damage caused by the covid vaccines is with Ivermectin. This is the reason I began taking Ivermectin -- before investigating all the other health benefits of the drug. Now, I take Ivermectin for many reasons.

  • We have Ivermectin dosage calculators based on research studies and for all the different uses of Ivermectin.
  • We are the only web source offering an Ivermectin dosage calculator in addition to different dosage estimates for different cancer types.
  • All of our calculators are easy to use (see our dosage calculator listing). Each person enters their personalized information into the calculator and receives our recommended extensively researched dosage estimate automatically and immediately calculated.
  • We also cover the broader problems with dosage calculation in medicine at the article The Problem With Dosage Calculation in Medicine, as this is an issue much larger than for one drug. 

About Our Ivermecting Testing Program and Recommended Ivermectin Source of Supply

  • We performed pharmaceutical testing on Ivermectin to find a lower-cost version that also matched Merck's original Ivermectin in bioequivalence.
  • You can read about the details of our Ivermectin testing in this article, Our Ivermectin Bioequivalence Testing.
  • We got Summit Products to carry this version of Ivermectin, which passed our bioequivalence testing.