How The FDA Backpeddled On Their False Claims Around Ivermectin

ByPrimary Researcher

Executive Summary

  • The FDA is dedicated to acting illegally to support its pharma puppeteers.
  • This is found in the FDA’s disregard for court judgments.

Introduction

Even after being told by a court they exceeded their authority and published misleading information about Ivermectin, weeks after being reprimanded by the court, the FDA has nothing to adjust their anti-Ivermectin article.

The following is what a court said about the FDA’s public statements on Ivermectin and its intimidation of MDs who wanted to prescribe Ivermectin to treat and as a preventative versus Ivermectin.

Important Point #1: FDA Overstepped Its Authority?

Expect no apology from the FDA after it lost another judgment in September of 2023, as is explained in the article ‘FDA Is Not a Physician’: Appeals Court Sides With Doctors on Ivermectin for COVID-19.

A federal appeals court in New Orleans ruled on Friday that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had overstepped its authority in their ruling that three doctors will be able to move forward with their lawsuit over the use of ivermectin off-label to treat COVID-19.

Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, one of three doctors who initially filed the charges, trumpeted the ruling as a victory for not only the truth, but patient rights.

“The FDA misled the public into thinking it has more authority than it does,” Dr. Bowden, a practitioner and founder of Coalition of Health Freedom, told The Epoch Times. “This decision confirms that the FDA is not your doctor and has no authority to tell doctors how to practice medicine.”

Oh…that has to hurt for the FDA. But will the FDA issue a press release stating that they did this?

Judge Don Willett wrote for the three person panel that also included Jennifer Walker Elrod and Edith Brown Clement. “The Doctors have plausibly alleged that FDA’s Posts fell on the wrong side of the line between telling about and telling to.”

“FDA is not a physician. It has authority to inform, announce, and apprise—but not to endorse, denounce, or advise. The Doctors have plausibly alleged that FDA’s Posts fell on the wrong side of the line between telling about and telling to. As such, the Doctors can use the APA to assert their ultra vires claims against the Agencies and the Officials.”

Important Point #2: The FDA Lied About Ivermectin Not Being For Humans?

The anti-ivermectin messaging put out by FDA officials also drew the ire of Judge Willett, who wrote that “Left unmentioned in most of that messaging: ivermectin also comes in a human version. And while the human version of ivermectin is not FDA-approved to treat the coronavirus, some people were using it off-label for that purpose.”

In the ruling social media posts made by the agency were cited as evidence, citing that “Even tweet-sized doses of personalized medical advice are beyond FDA’s statutory authority,” he wrote.

The FDA on Aug. 21, 2021, wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

Yes, the FDA lied about using Ivermectin and provided deceptive information to the public. They did this at the behest of their pharmaceutical funders.

I have read this FDA web page on Ivermectin numerous times since it was first published in 2021. Even though the court ruled that the FDA provides misleading information that Ivermectin is only for animals, this page has not been adjusted.