How the US and Western Media Has Covered Up the US's Complicity in Ukraine

Table of Contents: Select a Link to be Taken to That Section

Executive Summary

LinkedIn has morphed from an open content sharing platform to a propaganda outlet for corporations and the US government.

Introduction

LinkedIn has moved from just promoting establishment content over independent content based upon profit maximization (i.e., those who pay) to censorship of articles that contradict the status quo and promotion of false information provided by corporations and governments. This article explains that transition.

Our References for This Article

If you want to see our references for this article and other related Brightwork articles, see this link.

Go to top

How LinkedIn Changed

The US is also censoring the US involvement in Ukraine. Why was Hunter Biden on an energy board in Ukraine? Why was Biden meddling in Ukraine under the Obama Administration? After two years, the NYT finally verified that Hunter’s laptop was his, but previously it was “Russian Disinformation” censored by Big Tech. However, they will not report on the contents. How can it take two years to verify a laptop? It could have been verified in a week. The laptop was sent to the FBI, who sat on it. I am not a Trump supporter, but it would have been interesting to see the media reaction and the FBI’s reaction if Jared Kurshner’s laptop containing information related to money laundering and other crimes had been obtained in the same manner. Can anyone really see the establishment media supressing the story and calling it “Russian Disinformation?” The entire Russian Disinformation claim was conjured from nothing to hide information, some of it related to Ukraine.

Linked In Content Degradation Step #2: Censorship and Promotion of Only Corporate and Government Views and Content

My shares on LinkedIn had been suppressed for some time. This means that they were allowed to be shown to around 4,500 people in their feed (not page views, feed views) before the algorithm seemed to stop the share from continuing to add many more views. However, I had never had an article deleted or removed from LinkedIn before sharing some articles on covid. LinkedIn removed this covid article shares consistent with the overall pattern of censorship by Big Tech firms. This censorship has repeatedly proven to be incorrect. That is, Big Tech has been promoting government information that is false and censoring information that is true. One of the best indicators, if any information is accurate, one of the best indicators is if it is suppressed by Big Tech and establishment media, particularly if it is called “misinformation.” I shared an article on Ukraine How the US Tricked Zelensky Into Thinking the US and NATO Would Defend Ukraine from Russia. LinkedIn removed this article. This article explained how Zelensky was tricked into confronting Russia to goad Russia into attacking Ukraine, which has been a goal of the US defense establishment for years. This is all about weapons sales and maintaining money flow to the US defense complex, including the DOD. Instead of people reading my article, which I would love to see anyone at LinkedIn contradict, LinkedIn provides a link on the site that sends LinkedIn users to “curated content,” entirely approved by the DOD and US State Department.

LinkedIn provides highly censored information that prevents readers from understanding the overall context of the war and is controlled by the DOD and the US State Department. Notice how everything is slanted in one direction in this article.

This is the news that LinkedIn wants you to see. Not analysis like my article explains the background and shows the US instigating this war. LinkedIn only wants its audience to see content that supports the narrative of the DOD and State Department. Whenever any of these Big Tech firms censor an author, they are never willing to allow a public debate of that author because, most likely, the evidence would not support their claim.

Why was Oliver Stone’s documentary on Ukraine taken down by YouTube after being up for ten months? (this is embedded from Rumble, a noncensored video platform)

The answer is evident when you watch the video. It shows US involvement in a coup in Ukraine in 2013, how the US, along with NATO, has been meddling in Ukraine, and how the US is highly responsible for pushing Russia to invade Ukraine predictably. YouTube or Google because they are connected to the DOD, and US State Department does not think anyone should watch this video. This violates US freedom of speech, and Big Tech and the US government lie about their coordination.

It is difficult for the US Government to deny coordinating with Big Tech. The US Government met with Tik Toc influencers and provided them with false US Government talking points, which, just like US journalists, the young Tic Toc influences brainlessly repeated.

Conclusion

LinkedIn does not want you to think critically about this situation. LinkedIn actively suppresses independent voices and pushes up corporate voices that produce false information.

LinkedIn is not only dead as a content platform, and it is just an outlet for corporate and government PR.