How The US, China, The NIH And Dr Fauci Promulgated The Coronavirus

Executive Summary

• The development of the Coronavirus was a joint US-Chinese affair that required the authorities, including Dr. Fauci, to overturn precautions against a gain of function research during the Obama Administration.

Introduction

For over a year, the “authorities” have promoted an unproven but established hypothesis that the Coronavirus came from a wet market in the Wuhan Province of China. This is the approved hypothesis of the CCP, the US government, and the establishment media. Donald Trump called this hypothesis into question and was slammed for doing so by establishing Democratic-leaning media in the US and globally. However, it turns out that Trump was partially correct, but there was much he did not know. More likely than not, however, Dr. Fauci knew the entire time.

Our References for This Article

To see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.

Dr Fauci’s Background

Dr. Anthony Fauci has served in many US Administrations. He is highly respected in the field and is head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases within the National Institutes of Health.

Dr. Fauci’s background is in immunology and specifically infectious diseases. This makes it impossible for Fauci to deny knowledge around the gain of function research that will be the article’s topic.

Dr. Fauci and the Truth

The media and the public often refer to Dr. Fauci as a scientist. That is true, but one does not survive through the number of administrations Dr. Fauci has and led the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases without being a politician. Being political and politically motivated contradicts following a scientific approach. Being political means achieving an objective, and those objectives usually contradict scientific truth.

Repeated interviews and testimony from Dr. Fauci have revealed a willingness to bend the truth to meet political objectives. Jimmy Dore was among the first political analysts to pick up on this. Dore critiqued Dr. Fauchi in 2020 for providing contradictory information about wearing masks. It is important to note that in mid-2020, no one in mainstream media questioned Dr. Fauchi.

However, Dr. Fauci has been untouchable within the establishment media in the US. Depending on the group one speaks with, you can be branded as “anti-science.”

The Rand Paul, Dr. Fauchi Interaction

Observe the analysis of Dr. Fauchi’s interaction with Rand Paul.

Further, YouTube is at a degree of censorship that Jimmy Dore stated he could not cover the story unless it had first been covered elsewhere. YouTube has been suppressing Jimmy Dore’s channel because YouTube is financially and politically connected to the Democratic Party in the US, and Jimmy Dore critiques the Democratic Party.

Therefore, they retaliate by restricting the growth of subscribers to his channel. This is not a hypothetical or an evidence-free claim. I have noticed that Jimmy Dore’s subscriber numbers never increase, but his views are still high.

Second Coverage

This issue was also covered by the following video produced by The Hill.

It is of note that neither of these is establishment media outlets. 

This is Fox News. Fox News is not a good news source. It was run for many years by Roger Ailes and is part of the News Corp cesspool owned by Rupert Murdoch. However, sometimes truthful things appear on the news channel. This is one of those times.  

A Conspiracy Theory?

Notice the response from one establishment media entity on the exchange.

“Senator Paul didn’t directly accuse Dr. Fauci of engineering the pandemic, but that seemed at times to be his implication; it’s a line of questioning that appeared to play to conspiracy theories that circulate on the internet. Although Dr. Fauci has had plenty of practice fending off Senator Paul’s attacks in past encounters, this exchange seemed to unnerve him.” – MSN News

Rand Paul cannot ask questions that diverge from the wet market hypothesis’s official explanation without being called a conspiracy theorist. Also, why is a theory circulating on “the internet” a problem? This MSN article was published on “the Internet.” You are reading this article right now on “the internet.” Should we be reading and sharing theories by mail and not “the internet?” How is the internet our collective source of so much information, but then to be discredited when the author of a piece wants to do so?

What Unnerved Fauci About Rand Paul’s Questions?

It “unnerved” Dr. Fauci because this was the first time Dr. Fauci was confronted with so much damning evidence of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ involvement in funding the creation of the Coronavirus. And this is not a testimony that Dr. Fauci wants the world to see.

Observe this following strange quotation.