How The WHO’s Forecasted Death Rate From Covid Was Exaggerated By More Than 200 Times

ByPrimary Researcher

Executive Summary

  • Bill Gates has enormous influence and is a top contributor to the WHO.
  • This was critical in getting the WHO to exaggerate the mortality rate from covid.

Introduction

Part of the WHO’s business model is to exaggerate pandemics. Another entity that desires to exaggerate pandemics is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which only funds entities and research that maximize the ROI of Bill Gates’ investments. This financial bias led to the WHO massively exaggerating the forecasted death rate from covid.

Our References for This Article

If you want to see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.

Go to top

The WHO’s 3.95% Covid Death Rate Estimate

This quote places an even higher range on the WHO’s mortality estimate.

The experts voicing their opinions to avoid overreacting to the COVID-19 hysteria include the New England Journal of Medicine, Stanford University top AB epidemiologist, Dr. John Ioan needless, and the internationally, internationally Sweden’s top epidemiologist Anders TaiG. Now, in the end these these ignored experts were correct. The World Health Organization told the world that the mortality rate of COVID-19 was a whopping 3.4 to 4.5%. They then compare this to the mortality rate of the flu at point 1%. This fear mongering misinformation was the primer for creating the fake pandemic. The WHO derived mortality rate stated that 34 to 45 people out of 1000 would die from COVID. The actual mortality rate was estimated by our CDC is less than .02%. That is less than 1/15 to 1/20 of the fatality rate claimed by the World Health Organization of 3.4. To 4.5%. – Brainwashed: How the Media and Government Misread, Misinformed and Mismanaged the COVID-19 Virus

This is well explained, but I think this calculation at the end of the quote is wrong. But let us first address just the CDC death rate. If we take the midpoint between 3.4 and 4.5%, we end up with 3.95%. The 3.95% death rate from covid is now entirely discredited.

Ioannidis of Stanford Contradits the WHO’s Estimate

Ioannidis’ estimation is the following.

..the rate of one in 434 infected people (.2%) would die of the disease. For people under the age of 70, the mortality rate was estimated at .05%. – Why Most of What You Know About Covid is Wrong

If we take 3.95% and divide it by .02%, it is not 15 or 20 times different.

3.95%/.02% = 197

So, the WHO’s estimate was off by a factor of very close to 200. Furthermore, it is unclear that even the .05% mortality rate of those over 70 is accurate. This is because the death rate for the US did not increase; that .05% is mostly those that were going to die in any case. That is, they died of COVID-19, not because of COVID.

All The Offical Forecasts Were Inaccurate In One Direction

Something to observe is that every forecast I have reviewed that was used to drive covid hysteria is extraordinarily high versus what eventually transpired. That should be a question as to why the forecast is both positively biased and extraordinarily inaccurate.

Addressing the Damage

One of the best ways to address the damage caused by the covid vaccines is with Ivermectin. This is the reason I began taking Ivermectin -- before investigating all the other health benefits of the drug. Now, I take Ivermectin for many reasons.

  • We have Ivermectin dosage calculators based on research studies and for all the different uses of Ivermectin.
  • We are the only web source offering an Ivermectin dosage calculator in addition to different dosage estimates for different cancer types.
  • All of our calculators are easy to use (see our dosage calculator listing). Each person enters their personalized information into the calculator and receives our recommended extensively researched dosage estimate automatically and immediately calculated.
  • We also cover the broader problems with dosage calculation in medicine at the article The Problem With Dosage Calculation in Medicine, as this is an issue much larger than for one drug. 

About Our Ivermecting Testing Program and Recommended Ivermectin Source of Supply

  • We performed pharmaceutical testing on Ivermectin to find a lower-cost version that also matched Merck's original Ivermectin in bioequivalence.
  • You can read about the details of our Ivermectin testing in this article, Our Ivermectin Bioequivalence Testing.
  • We got Summit Products to carry this version of Ivermectin, which passed our bioequivalence testing.