If The Covid Vaccines Are Safe Why Did The FDA And Drug Companies Ask for 75 Years To Produce Documents on Them?
Executive Summary
- The pharma companies health authorities state that the covid vaccines are safe and effective.
- Why have they asked for nearly a century to release documents?
Introduction
The pharmaceutical companies, FDA, and media have told people that concerns about COVID-19 vaccine safety are only conspiracy theories. The pharma companies and the FDA have added logs to the conspiracy theory fire by pushing off the public sharing of vaccine documents until close to the next century.
Our References for This Article
To see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.
If The Vaccines Are Safe, Why Have The FDA And Drug Companies Asked for 75 Years To Produce Public Documents on Them?
There is something in the documentation on the mRNA covid vaccines that the manufacturers very much want to hide. This is explained in the following quotation.
The British Medical Journal Demands The Immediate Release of Data
The British Medical Journal is one of the world’s oldest general medical journals, having been founded in 1840, and has editorial freedom from the British Medical Association.
The British Medical Journal (BMJ) has demanded the full and immediate release of all data related to COVID-19 vaccines and treatments, saying it is in the public’s interest to do so.
BMJ, a weekly peer-reviewed medical trade journal published by the trade union the British Medical Association, called for the release of the data in an editorial published on Wednesday.
“Today, despite the global rollout of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments, the anonymized participant-level data underlying the trials for these new products remain inaccessible to doctors, researchers, and the public—and are likely to remain that way for years to come,” BMJ said. “This is morally indefensible for all trials, but especially for those involving major public health interventions.”
BMJ also accused pharmaceutical companies of “reaping vast profits without adequate independent scrutiny of their scientific claims,” pointing to Pfizer, whose COVID vaccine trial was “funded by the company and designed, run, analyzed, and authored by Pfizer employees.”
This is noteworthy because the BMJ has many pharmaceutical conflicts itself. So, to call out pharma companies like this publicly tells you how egregious this data hiding is.
Pfizer Can’t Be Bothered Until May of 2025
New York-headquartered Pfizer still holds that trial data and has indicated that it won’t begin considering requests for such data until May 2025—24 months after the primary study completion date of May 15, 2023, which is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. – The Epoch Times
And why is that? Pfizer says their vaccines are safe and effective.
Why would they have the right to keep this information from the public after being chiefly vaccinated?
May 2025 is when they consider requests, not when they provide information. Pfizer has been repeatedly caught and paid billion-dollar fines to the DOJ for lying and engaging in fraud in the past, and there is no less reliable source of information than Pfizer.
The FDA Needs Until Close to 2100
Meanwhile, The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had asked a judge to give it 75 years to produce all the data concerning the Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine. – The Epoch Times
The public release of the JFK documents has been repeatedly postponed for over 58 years after JFK’s assassination for one apparent reason. They contain information that contradicts the Warren Commission Report. For the same reason, the FDA must release the documents close to the next century. By waiting until close to the next century, the FDA can be assured that everyone today will be dead.
The Judge Says Differently
However, a judge earlier this month ordered that the FDA make public 12,000 pages of the data it used to make decisions regarding approvals for the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine by the end of the month. The FDA must also release Pfizer’s vaccine data at a rate of 55,000 pages a month until all of the requested pages are public. – The Epoch Times
What is odd about this is that the FDA does not have to create any of these documents; all it has to do is release them. It could release all of them tomorrow, and all it has to do is make them available by providing the entire archive.
How the BMJ Finds Having No Access to the Underlying Data of the Studies Unacceptable
“We are left with publications but no access to the underlying data on reasonable request,” BMJ said. “This is worrying for trial participants, researchers, clinicians, journal editors, policymakers, and the public. The journals that have published these primary studies may argue that they faced an awkward dilemma, caught between making the summary findings available quickly and upholding the best ethical values that support timely access to underlying data. In our view, there is no dilemma; the anonymized individual participant data from clinical trials must be made available for independent scrutiny.” – The Epoch Times
Yes, that is correct. And you can see the suspicion within the BMJ, and the BMJ thinks they may have placed their name on fraudulent articles.
No More Dancing to the Tune of Rich Global Corporations?
BMJ added that regulators are not there to “dance to the tune of rich global corporations and enrich them further” but to protect the general public’s health and for that reason, they said, we need “complete data transparency for all studies, we need it in the public interest, and we need it now.” – The Epoch Times
This is amusing because that is the only thing regulators have done since the pandemic began.
Their compliance with these corporations caused the pandemic in the first place, as the COVID-19 virus was never as dangerous as claimed. See the article How The Average Age of Mortality from Covid is 81.5.
How can a virus be so deadly if the average age of a person who succumbs to it is near their end of life? The flu routinely kills people in that age category. People need to be under no illusions about life when they reach 80. One can die at any time, and the thalamus, the master controller of the immune system, has been shrunken to a very small version of its original size.
The CDC Sued by the Informed Consent Action Network
In December, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was also sued by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) over claims that it is improperly withholding COVID-19 vaccine safety data from the American public.
ICAN is asking the CDC to provide de-identified post-licensure safety data for the COVID-19 vaccines in the CDC’s v-safe system so as to assure transparency with the general public regarding claims by both the CDC and the Biden administration that COVID-19 vaccines are “safe and effective.” – The Epoch Times
Of course, the CDC has been hiding information from the public.
This segment shows lying on the part of the CDC director. This type of lying, both creating fake statistics and omitting statistics, is part and parcel of how the CDC is run. They are one of the greatest producers of false medical information globally.
This issue is also covered in humor detail in the following video.
Can the FDA only spare 10 of their 18,000 employees to work on providing documents on the vaccines?
With 18,000 employees, the FDA stated that it lacks the resources to provide data on the vaccines to the court and that it only has ten employees.
This illustrates that no lie is too farfetched for the FDA to protect its BFFs in the pharmaceutical companies.
The Canadian Covid Care Alliance
The Canadian Covid Care Alliance produced an excellent report on Pfizer’s test. It should make anyone concerned about the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines.
Some screenshots from this report are included below.
Concern #1: A Disastrously Run Clinical Trial
This graphic shows how Pfizer falsified the study submitted to the FDA. The study presented to the FDA was junk and should be retracted.
Concern #2: An Increase In Illness Due to the Vaccines
The study showed a dramatic increase in risks of adverse reactions.
Concern #3: The Old Pharmaceutical Company Trick: Changed Endpoints
This graphic shows that the entire logic of the test and the vaccine rollout is in error. The logic is not maximizing the public good but maximizing revenues and profits for Pfizer.
Concern #4: Fraudulently Hidden Side Effects
Pfizer faked and miscategorized the adverse reactions as far less severe than they were. This is a fraud. However, as the FDA is in bed with Pfizer, and so many senior people at the FDA are paid off by Pfizer or hope to work for them in the future, there will be no repercussions for Pfizer. This is shown in the following graphic.
How the Vaccine Manufacturers and Health Authorities Made It Up As They Went Along
The three-week lag between the first and second vaccination was not based on science but was used to obtain results quickly. This is explained in the following video.
Repeated directives supposedly based upon science have turned out to be based on either nothing or some expediency. Now that they know more, the CDC has spaced out the shots to reduce heart inflammation.
Constant Lying From Pharmaceutical Companies
This argument from Pfizer and Moderna to not perform long-term trials from being performed is amazing.
This is explained in the quote from the article Why Do Vaccines Consistently Fail?
Critical long-term follow-up to determine the risk benefit ratio for these immunizations was not available and Pfizer has refused to release their raw data for outside review until at least 2025.
Not surprisingly once the EUA was granted, the vaccine manufacturers also reneged on their promise to conduct a long-term placebo controlled trial of the vaccines (which would show long-term side effects) under the spurious argument that the vaccine was so safe and effective in was unethical to not give it to the placebo participants.
They got the vaccine approved in part based on this promise to conduct a trial — and then pulled back a foundational element which is why they granted the EUA.
Conclusion
These vaccines present a significant danger to the public. These vaccines were not sufficiently tested, and there is zero understanding of the long-term risks.
This is why the documents on them are being hidden from the public and why the pharmaceutical companies and FDA are trying to postpone the full release of the documents into the next century.
Addressing the Damage
One of the best ways to address the damage caused by the covid vaccines is with Ivermectin. This is the reason I began taking Ivermectin -- before investigating all the other health benefits of the drug. Now, I take Ivermectin for many reasons.
- We have Ivermectin dosage calculators based on research studies and for all the different uses of Ivermectin.
- We are the only web source offering an Ivermectin dosage calculator in addition to different dosage estimates for different cancer types.
- All of our calculators are easy to use (see our dosage calculator listing). Each person enters their personalized information into the calculator and receives our recommended extensively researched dosage estimate automatically and immediately calculated.
- We also cover the broader problems with dosage calculation in medicine at the article The Problem With Dosage Calculation in Medicine, as this is an issue much larger than for one drug.
About Our Ivermecting Testing Program and Recommended Ivermectin Source of Supply
- We performed pharmaceutical testing on Ivermectin to find a lower-cost version that also matched Merck's original Ivermectin in bioequivalence.
- You can read about the details of our Ivermectin testing in this article, Our Ivermectin Bioequivalence Testing.
- We got Summit Products to carry this version of Ivermectin, which passed our bioequivalence testing.