Is it Time to Perform Regime Change at the Vatican for US National Security?

Table of Contents: Select a Link to be Taken to That Section

Executive Summary

The Pope said something about the Ukraine war that contradicts the Pentagon, PBS, CNN, The New York Times, and other establishment media.
This brings up whether it’s time to “take out” Pope Francis.

Introduction

For months all establishment media outlets have been proposing the Pentagon narrative on the war in Ukraine. This simplified story removes the US from any responsibility, exaggerates the “war crimes” of Russia, and requires that everyone agree with this narrative or be pilloried. Pope Francis has called into question this official narrative, and this article questions whether it’s time to see Pope Francis as a threat to US national security.

This video explains how part of the blame for the war in Ukraine should be laid at the feet of NATO, which has been instigating this war for decades.

Francis also observes that a significant motivation for the war is weapons sales. This reality is explored in the following video.

These videos show a coordinated dance between the anchors and the people being interviewed. There is no disclosure of financial interests on the part of the network or the people being interviewed.

To call into question the motivations of US defense contractors, or to ask why these financial disclosures have not been made, or the financial benefits the reaped by US defense contractors due to the war in Ukraine is to be called a “Putin Puppet.” Under this idea, exploring the financial biases of defense contractors is precisely what “Putin would want you to do.”

How the US Engages in Global Regime Change

When the US does not like the government of a country, it often engages in regime change. According to the elites, “democracy” means the right of the US to choose the governments of other countries, as I cover in the article What Globalist Billionaires and the New York Times Mean When they Use the Term Democracy.

As the Vatican is not on the agenda with the Pentagon and US defense contractors — and therefore threatens “US national security,” one wonders if it is time for regime change at the Vatican.

Strategy #1: Organized and Arab Spring

Arab Springs are CIA-organized protests that are coordinated through Big Tech like Facebook. Every Arab Spring protest in the Middle East and the protests in Ukraine in 2014 was promulgated and coordinated by the CIA. The intent is to develop a violent event that can then be weaponized against the current government of that country. Facebook, Twitter, and other Pentagon/CIA-controlled Big Tech censor those that oppose the “Arab Spring” and amplify those that support the “Arab Spring.”

Observe this coverage by PBS. PBS takes its instructions on economics from all of its billionaire donors, while on foreign policy, PBS is remotely controlled by the Pentagon. For this reason, PBS does not discuss anything covered in this article.

“Arab Springs” only occur in countries the CIA has targeted for regime change. Notice there was no Arab Spring in Saudi Arabia. Why not? Because Saudi Arabia and the US have a strong relationship, the US approves of the Saudi Arabian regime.

Al Jazeera is entirely owned and controlled by the Qatar government. They provide media output that seems “progressive” but adheres to the official talking points. Qatar, like Saudi Arabia, is part of US foreign policy and, like PBS, does not explain US involvement or the dark underbelly of Arab Springs.

Both PBS and Al Jazeera decry the lack of progress after the Arab Springs. However, the point of Arab Springs is not to improve the governments but to change governments to those controlled by or at least friendly to the US.

Strategy #2: State That the Government is a Military Threat

This was done in Iraq and Libya. In Libya, the Obama administration, along with select NATO alliance members like France and supported by the Gulf States, proposed that Gaddafi was about to massacre many Libyans.

And this brings up the following question — NATO is ostensibly an alliance for European countries to defend against Russian invasion. Why is NATO coordinating the bombing of a North African country?

The Central Role of NATO in Bombing Libya

This video explains that the Gulf States and NATO decided to depose Gaddafi’s regime.

As with the invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, and the proxy war in Syria, all of the information provided to the public turned out to be false.

The answer to why NATO organized the bombing of Libya and a regime change is that NATO is now what it appears. NATO is primarily a tool of US foreign policy.

Putin explains how NATO is not what it seems. It is essential that Putin be given minimal opportunity to explain his position. Nearly all of the coverage of Putin is other people, often connected to the US defense establishment, explaining Putin’s intent.

This is what Pope Francis is talking about, and for this reason, he must be canceled or ignored.

Remember that no evidence has to be presented that the government targeted regime change or intends to do something terrible. All that is needed is that the CIA release information that they have “intelligence” that this or that will happen. So in the case of the Vatican, the CIA could say that “intelligence” shows that the Swiss Guards have been radicalized and are about to massacre people in Vatican City. The only way manages this is to bomb the Vatican. And that the US only wants to bring the Vatican democracy.

Strategy #3: Economic Sanctions

Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Russia, and many other countries end up with economic sanctions. This could be applied to the Vatican as well. The idea is that the people of Vatican city will then depose Pope Francis.

This will make Pope Francis think twice about voicing views that diverge from the Pentagon’s narrative.

Sanctions never do anything to result in regime change, but the US keeps using them.

What Will Happen to Pope Francis

The most likely outcome is not regime change, but instead for the Pentagon to instruct the establishment media not to cover the story so that almost none of the population knows that Pope Francis said this.

Conclusion

According to the establishment media and the Pentagon, Pope Francis is guilty of spreading misinformation and disinformation. Misinformation and disinformation is anything that disagrees with the official position of the Pentagon, or in the case of covid, anything that conflicts with Pfizer or Fauci. It is incredible how many people hold views that are “unacceptable” as Justin Trudeau has said. Joe Rogan, Dr. Robert Malone, Jimmy Dore, Gren Greenwald, Tulsi Gabbard, and now even the Pope have proposed ideas that simply cannot be tolerated. According to the establishment, all of these people must be canceled. We must have “unity” around a single perspective, which is whatever the establishment – be it the Pentagon or Pfizer, or Bill Gates says is true.