Executive Summary
- This article is part of our honest vendor series, which is one of the only ratings of vendors rather than applications.
- The vendor quality is critical to the decision making process as software purchases have a high long term involvement by the software vendor.
Introduction
MicroStrategy has been an important contributor in the BI space for quite some time. It is one of the few independent vendors that is primarily focused on BI. MicroStrategy is primarily an on premises vendor, but does offer a SaaS solution called MicroStrategy Cloud and MicroStrategy Express.
Quality of Information Provided
The quality of information provided by MicroStrategy is low, and this is our primary criticism of the company. Its salespeople routinely make confusing comparisons between its application and other vendor’s applications. This has repeatedly been pointed out that MicroStrategy competes with applications that have less scope and complexity by misrepresenting the maintenance cost required. MicroStrategy criticizes Tableau in sales presentations for not having as much under the hood as MicroStrategy, but they neglect to point out the extra maintenance required by MicroStrategy. There are different types of applications in the market as is explained in the BI Software Category Section – what we refer to as BI Light and BI Heavy, and it makes little sense for one to criticize another BI software vendor for either lacking a full complement of features or of being too heavy in maintenance – as these are features of the subcategory of application. Secondly, one of the most common errors that is made in evaluating BI applications is to attempt to get all BI applications from a single software vendor. MicroStrategy’s desire to present themselves as an easy self service application was apparent in these following screenshots.
This report makes it appear as if MicroStrategy is a good one-stop shop for BI. However, this is misleading. MicroStrategy may be broad, but it is not a one-stop shop for BI, and no vendor is.
Here is an example of why, their analytics front end is a poor substitute for QlikView or Tableau.
Tableau is a joy to work with. Why force users to use MicroStrategy’s front end, when Tableau can connect to any MicroStrategy data source?
MicroStrategy Desktop can be downloaded quickly, but this give the impression that no IT will be necessary with MicroStrategy and that the overall solution is self service, when it isn’t.
I think we should be able to agree that enterprise BI systems are not really available in 2 days. Yes, you can login to a new systems if it is SaaS in two days, but that is not really the point.
Consulting and Support
We rate MicroStrategy consulting and support as above average. We think future performance will lag previous performance because of the challenges that MicroStrategy is facing as its bureaucracy steadily increases.
Internal Efficiency
While at one time an internally efficient company, MicroStrategy has been moving to a lower quality growth path in both their hiring practices and how employees are treated. MicroStrategy’s management is average. They seem to get the technology side of the business, but are weaker in organization maintenance and people management and the company overall is showing signs of steadily increasing bureaucracy.
Innovation
MicroStrategy has good product quality, and has historically been an innovator, and has recently innovated in areas like mobile BI that are not even its previous strengths, but due to the changes we have noted in its organizational management, we have reduced its Current Innovation Score somewhat. This is because we expect MicroStrategy to increasingly tail off in its innovation.
Vendor Scores
Honest Vendor Ratings
- VC = Vendor Consulting
- VS = Vendor Support
- QIP = Quality of Information Provided
- IE = Internal Efficiency
- I = Innovation
- C = Category
- ACS = Average Category Score
Vendor | VC | VS | QIP | IE | I | C | ACG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average Score for the BI Heavy Software Category | 6.4 | 5.3 | 5.1 | 4.5 | 4.4 | BI Heavy | Category Average |
Average Score for the BI Light Software Category | 7.7 | 6.7 | 5 | 6.3 | 6.8 | BI Light | Category Average |
Average Score for the CRM Software Category | 5.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 3.4 | CRM | Category Average |
Average Score for the PLM Software Category | 7.3 | 7.5 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.3 | PLM | Category Average |
Average Score for the Production Planning Software Category | 7.3 | 6.7 | 6 | 5.2 | 5.7 | Production Planning | Category Average |
Average Score for the Small and Medium ERP Software Category | 7.3 | 6.7 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 5.9 | Small and Medium ERP | Category Average |
Average Score for the Supply Planning Software Category | 7.5 | 6.7 | 6.1 | 5.5 | 5.6 | Supply Planning | Category Average |
Average Score Score for the Demand Planning Software Category | 7.7 | 6.9 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 6.1 | Demand Planning | Category Average |
Average Score for the Big ERP Software Category | 4.7 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.6 | Big ERP | Category Average |
Actuate | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 5 | BI Heavy | Application Specific |
Arena Solutions | 9 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | PLM | Application Specific |
AspenTech | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 7 | Production Planning | Application Specific |
Base CRM | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | CRM | Application Specific |
Birst | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8.5 | 9 | BI Heavy | Application Specific |
Business Forecast Systems | 9 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 8 | Demand Planning | Application Specific |
Delfoi | 8 | 8 | 8.5 | 4 | 8 | Production Planning | Application Specific |
Demand Works | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Supply Planning | Application Specific |
ERPNext | 8 | 8 | 8.5 | 10 | 9 | Small and Medium ERP | Application Specific |
FinancialForce | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 9.5 | Financial | Application Specific |
Hamilton Grant | 8 | 9.5 | 8 | 9.5 | 8 | PLM | Application Specific |
Intacct | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9.5 | Financial | Application Specific |
Intuit | 8 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 6.5 | Financial | Application Specific |
JDA | 3.5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Demand Planning | Application Specific |
Microsoft | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Small and Medium ERP | Application Specific |
MicroStrategy | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | BI Heavy | Application Specific |
NetSuite | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | CRM | Application Specific |
OpenERP | 7 | 8 | 8.5 | 8 | 7 | Small and Medium ERP | Application Specific |
Oracle | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Many | Application Specific |
PlanetTogether | 9 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | Supply Planning | Application Specific |
Preactor | 7 | 8 | 7.5 | 3 | 3 | Production Planning | Application Specific |
ProcessPro | 10 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 9 | Small and Medium ERP | Application Specific |
QlikTech | 8 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 9.5 | CRM | Application Specific |
Salesforce | 7 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 6 | CRM | Application Specific |
SAS | 9 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 | Demand Planning | Application Specific |
SugarCRM | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | CRM | Application Specific |
Tableau | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | BI Light | Application Specific |
Teradata | 9 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 6 | 8 | BI Heavy | Application Specific |
ToolsGroup | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | Demand Planning | Application Specific |
SAP | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Many | Application Specific |
Part of the Following Software Category
Select the following link(s) if you have subscribed to the following analytical product(s).
Software Selection Package for BI Heavy
References
https://www.biscorecard.com/