The Problem with Coke’s Anti-White Employee Training

Executive Summary

• Coke introduced a highly anti-white training program under the construct of diversity.
• We analyze we these types of programs are becoming more common.

Introduction

This video describes the anti-white training that was being used at Coke. 

Non-Whites Putting Whites in Their Place

This is the problem with allowing non-white immigration into countries. When their numbers are sufficient, they seek to take over the system. Now whites are the targeted group. There is a curious inconsistency. All white countries are horribly racist. According to the official storyline, concurrently, non-whites always choose white countries to immigrate to when they can. That combination does not make any sense. Now non-whites don’t even bother trying not to be racist. They know they can be as racist as they want while demanding ultra racial sensitivity from whites.

There is no way around the fact that this type of training did not exist back when the US was more white. And the less white the US becomes, the worse it will be for whites. Look at South Africa. Whites are leaving that country while the country craters under non-white leadership. However, the promise was a “rainbow coalition,” which translated into non-white rule. South Africa has seen the greatest decline of a society not invaded during a war. 

The Dirty Little Secret about Humans #1

And this all due to a dirty little secret. And that secret is that people like taking things from other people. That is a basic feature of humans. Whites create the best societies. And non-whites want to invade those societies and take those benefits for themselves. They can’t do so militarily, so they will do so with immigration and with guilt and then high birth rates. Whites that live in a predominantly white society don’t have to attend training like this Coke mind control. However, you do if you live in an increasingly non-white society. Whites should ask themselves, how do they personally benefit from allowing their countries to become “diverse” i.e., the code word for less white? Once they consider this question, they should realize that all they do is lose. 

The Dirty Little Secret #2

Whites, who are often the biggest proponents of diversity, prefer to live around whites. This is something that whites share with non-whites — which is that they both prefer to live around whites or in white areas. However, it is only when the white person does it that it is considered racist. However, the non-white person benefiting from a society they could never themselves create is never accused of stealing whites’ society from whites. 

What this means is that for politically correct purposes, whites often support the immigration of non-whites while seeking to distance themselves from non-whites. Whites have code words for this — one of the most prominent being close to “good schools.” Using the term “good schools,” one can declare their interest to live in white areas but not use a racial term to explain their movements. This is done even though it is entirely obvious that people are seeking white areas to live. Many whites are perfectly happy to support the growth of non-whites, as long as they can continue to live in white areas. 

Time to Make Taiwan and the Congo “More Diverse?” 

Also, why are white countries being held to a different standard than non-white countries? White countries are being asked to become less white, to lose their white majorities. Whites are asked to “dismantle white supremacy,” which means to allow non-whites to take over the societies that their ancestors built entirely. However, no one asks Taiwan or the Congo to become less Taiwanese or less Congolese and become more Swedish or Papua New Guinean. The question should be asked, “why not” if diversity is supposedly such a desirable feature. Why are only white societies demanded to become diverse if diversity is a universal value? As non-whites do not create anywhere near as good societies as whites, how will white countries managed once the calm and structured systems (not all, Russia for example, is not a calm and structured society) are inhabited by non-whites, who create worse societies? 

The Failure and Overpopulation of Non White Countries

After the post colonial period, we were told that all non-white countries needed was freedom from colonial rule, and they would develop like white countries. A few exceptions, like Singapore, exist. However, overall the post colonial period has shown nearly all of these countries have failed to “be like white countries.” But what they lacked in progress towards Western ideas, they made up for in population growth. The population has grown so rapidly due to the reticence to use birth control and plan their societies to not become more like Western countries. And even if they could, with such large populations, following a Western modality of resource consumption, it would end humans’ planetary habitability. What development economists can’t confront is that Western consumption of resources for the world is dead. By using Western technology and medicine selectively (that is inoculations against disease, but no Western birth control), the world has put itself in an impossible situation. And the continual migration of non-whites from non-white countries that have mostly given up hope to high resource consuming white countries is not the resolution to this problem.

Conclusions

Allowing non-whites to immigrate to a white country is nothing but a loss for whites. Non-whites, who cannot create white societies will always seek to exit their less civilized societies and to enter white societies. Once in the white society, they will complain about racism. What they do not mention is how they bring down the living standards of whites. In the future, a major component to how good a white society is to live in is how high the percentage of whites is in the country. The US, Australia, and Western Europe are all in serious decline as places to live because whites were tricked into and stupid enough to allow their societies to be overrun by non-whites. Non-whites gain whenever they can escape a non-white society and gain entry into white society. And whites lose whenever they allow non-whites to immigrate into their society. This is why all whites should not only oppose diversity but oppose all non-white immigration into their countries.