The Problem With How Medicine Approaches the Immune System

ByPrimary Researcher

Executive Summary

  • Medicine’s approach to the immune system is very odd. This article explains how it is odd and why medicine takes this approach.

Introduction

This article discusses the curious way medicine frames and approaches the immune system.

Go to top

Examples of The Way Medicine Approaches and Frames the Immune System

Example #1: The Presentation of Vaccines

When the CDC talks about vaccines, they usually spend close to no time discussing the immune system — even though a vaccine works by triggering a response in the immune system. During the covid pandemic, the CDC spent no time explaining to people how to improve their immune systems and put almost all of its effort behind promoting vaccines.

You can either watch the entire video or trust me that nowhere in this video does the CDC Director Walensky discuss the immune system. At first glance, it may seem illogical, but the reason for de-emphasizing the immune system is that those who control the CDC, which is the pharmaceutical companies, are not selling an immune system; they are selling a vaccine. 

Example #2: The Presentation of Immunotherapy for Cancer Treatment

Immunotherapy is a highly invasive treatment for cancer — where drugs are used to make the immune system more active. Immunotherapy is not immunomodulation; it is “immuno-triggering.”

This is explained in the quotation from the book The Metabolic Approach to Cancer: Integrating Deep Nutrition, the Ketogenic Diet, and Nontoxic Bio-Individualized Therapies.

In 1891 Dr. William B. Coley, who has been called the father of immunotherapy, injected streptococcal organisms into a patient who had an inoperable cancer. He hypothesized that the fever produced by the infection might, as a side effect, shrink the malignant tumor. And he was right. This is one of the first examples of immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy is based on the idea that a patient’s immune system can be stimulated or enhanced to attack tumors. Some clinics in Germany and Mexico still use “Coley’s toxin,” along with In 1891 Dr. William B. Coley, who has been called the father of immunotherapy, injected streptococcal organisms into a patient who had an inoperable cancer. He hypothesized that the fever produced by the infection might, as a side effect, shrink the malignant tumor. And he was right. This is one of the first examples of immunotherapy. Immunotherapy is based on the idea that a patient’s immune system can be stimulated or enhanced to attack tumors. Some clinics in Germany and Mexico still use “Coley’s toxin,” along with newer generations of fever-inducing therapies.

This is foundationally what the new, more advanced immunotherapy treatments are also doing. Coley was “triggering” the immune system to get it to respond, and this is why immunotherapy so often produces autoimmune diseases. And the side effects are not limited to autoimmune disease. Immunotherapy has a substantial percentage of patients that experience hyper progression, which I explain in the article Hyperprogression: How Immunotherapy Frequently Leads to Worsening Cancer. Hyperprogression is where the immunotherapy makes the cancer so aggressive it kills the patient.

Why Does the Immune System Fail For Those With Cancer?

The information from the medical establishment does not answer the question of why the immune system did not work in the first place, and they don’t know why it fails.