What is the Effectiveness of Fenbendazole and Cancer?

Executive Summary

• Fenbendazole is a drug with nearly identical uses as Ivermectin.
• The question addressed in this article is whether Fenbendazole is helpful against cancer.

Introduction

In a previous article titled How Ivermectin Is Useful for Treating Cancer, we covered the evidence for the benefits of Ivermectin for cancer. Here we use Fenbendazole for cancer.

What is Fenbendazole?

This description is from Wikipedia.

Fenbendazole is a broad spectrum benzimidazole anthelmintic used against gastrointestinal parasites including: giardia, roundworms, hookworms, whipworms, the tapeworm genus Taenia (but not effective against Dipylidium caninum, a common dog tapeworm), pinworms, aelurostrongylus, paragonimiasis, strongyles, and strongyloides that can be administered to sheep, cattle, horses, fish, dogs, cats, rabbits, most reptiles, freshwater shrimp tanks as planaria and hydra treatments, as well as seals.

An anthelmintic is a class of antiparasitics that kills the parasite but leaves the host unharmed. Anthelmintics are disadvantaged because parasites have evolved to resist this class of antiparasitics. Recall that parasites like viruses are much simpler organisms than we are used to — so simple and often tiny that they can’t be seen. Viruses are even more straightforward, lacking any biological machinery to be considered “alive.” Both can evolve quickly, and most parasites have become resistant to anthelmintics. This is explained in the following quotation.

Results in sheep and goats since 2010 reveal an average prevalence of resistance to benzimidazoles of 86%, macrocyclic lactones except moxidectin 52%, levamisole 48%, and moxidectin 21%. – Wikipedia

However, this is unimportant in this article as we are investigating using an anthelmintic, Fenbendazole, against cancer.

Only for Animals?

Fenbendazole is an extremely popular antiparasitic sold under too many names, as covered at drugs.com. Panacur is one brand of Fenbendazole that can be purchased online.

Now the medical establishment and their controlled media will say that because this drug is used on animals, only illiterate hillbillies would use such a thing on themselves. The problem with this false claim is the large number of drugs used for humans and animals. Furthermore, the FDA approved the most recent covid booster after being tested on only eight mice. (the results were hidden from the public). However, the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies did not say the results were invalid because the vaccines were only tested on animals. The medical establishment knows very well that many drugs are used in both humans and animals — however, they hope that if they stigmatize drugs as “animal drugs,” the public won’t investigate the topic — and will use only the drugs that are profit-maximizing for the pharmaceutical companies. This clearly illustrates that there is no lie that the medical establishment or even individual MDs (the vast majority anyway) won’t tell for money. 

Test Drugs on Mammals, Use the Same Drugs for Humans and Animals, — but Don’t Use Veterinary Drugs on Humans?

Why are drugs continually tested on mice if humans should never take the same medicine as animals? Shockingly, mice are mammals also (who knew?). And this “mice conspiracy” goes quite deep. Suppose the medical establishment’s claims against drugs used for animals will continue. In that case, they need to stop using mice in experiments, as all the data accumulated from these studies is irrelevant. There are millions of mice around the world in labs being experimented on today because they are “cheap” and reproduce quickly. They are considered the lowest cost and most accessible to manage “substitute humans.”

Example #1: The Extensive Testing of Human Drugs on Mice

This video explains why mice are used in medical research. 

Example #2: How Many Mice Are Used on an Annual Basis?

The video makes the argument that medical research is extremely firmly mice based — using around 20 to 30 million mice a year — but that many of the mice studies end up not translating to humans. However, some discrepancies in outcomes between mice and human trials are undoubtedly due to the cheaper mice-based studies having fewer controls. Human problems cannot be approved in the US until testing is performed on mice. 

The medical establishment’s inconsistent or hypocritical stance (using mice for testing but then stating that there is a clear dividing line between veterinary and human drugs — even though many medications are used for animals and humans) is simple. The medical establishment does not want a cross-over in selling veterinary and human medicines; veterinary drugs are sold inexpensively, while human medications are not.

So when testing new drugs, they use animals like crazy, but when selling drugs, they put up an illogical firewall; this firewall is unrelated to what is scientifically true but is simply because it is profit-maximizing to do so.

Antiparasitics Have a Cross Over to Fighting Cancer

When Ivermectin was first discovered, cultured, and modified from an original bacteria found on a golf course in Japan — it proved remarkably effective against parasites. I cover the reason for this in the article The Mechanisms of How Antiparasitics Work to Mitigate Cancer.

Why Fenbendazole is Currently and Will Most Likely Only Ever be Approved by the FDA as an Antiparasitic Drug for Animals

Fenbendazole is only approved by the FDA as an anti-parasitical and has been for over 50 years -- and it is not approved for humans. But the likelihood is essentially zero that any pharmaceutical company will ever go to the expense to perform a clinical trial on Fenbendazole to expand its usage outside of antiparasitics and for humans. Because there are no profits to be made from such an endeavor -- and that is the only way drugs are approved, a pharmaceutical company must invest the money into performing two clinical trials. The reason for this is that Fenbendazole has already fallen off of its patent. 

Pharmaceutical companies are far more likely to fund studies to undermine Fenbendazole, as Bill Gates' foundation did with Hydroxychloroquine.

The US Government Health Authorities Are Aligned With Promoting Only Patent Drugs

Studies have continued on Fenbendazole, but the NIH or any other pharmaceutical company will not fund them. However, at the direction of pharmaceutical companies, the FDA actively discourages using Fenbendazole.

Case Study #1: The FDA’s Statement and Laetrile

This is concisely explained in the quote from William W Vodra, Former Associate Chief Council for the FDA.

No one is going to pay $70,000 for a new cancer drug if they can buy Laetrile for 75 cents.

Laetrile was a drug that was shut down in the 1970s by the medical establishment (specifically Sloan Kettering) that showed promise against cancer. Laetrile is the topic of the documentary The Lie of America's War on Cancer. However, this quote from Vodra is from the 1970s.

Today, the average new chemotherapy drug is over $200,000, and immunotherapy drugs are over $300,000.

What is curious about this admission by Vodra is that it is not made by a pharmaceutical company -- which would be entirely expected. Instead, it is made by a top official at the FDA.

When you can't distinguish quotes from pharmaceutical companies and a drug regulator like the FDA, one has to question how independent that drug regulator is. 

It's apparent that neither the FDA nor NIH cares about the evidence supporting Fenbendazole. And this is not just an issue limited to Fenbendazole. While patent drugs constantly have their off-label usage expanded without any studies submitted to the FDA.

MDs are given negative reinforcement for using Fenbendazole for anything but as an antiparasitic. Fenbendazole usage as an animal antiparasitic is for a much shorter duration than using Fenbendazole against cancer. The dosage is also much lower as an antiparasitic. However, by contrast, antidepressants or statins constantly have their usage expanded without any new clinical trials being submitted because they are preferred drugs. 

The reality is that generic drugs are considered drugs the pharmaceutical industry wants to de-emphasize -- hopefully (that is the hope of the pharmaceutical companies) to be replaced by an on-patent drug at some point in the future. In the case of drugs Paxlovid and Molnupiravir, both were promoted by the medical establishment to replace the generic Ivermectin versus covid, even though both were useless against covid and far more expensive than either Ivermectin or Fenbendazole and were far less safe drugs. The promotion of Paxlovid and Molnupiravir and the impression of Ivermectin by the medical establishment (including the FDA) and the establishment media should tell you all you need to know about how they work. 

More About The C19Early Clinical Trial Comparison Website

The C19early.com website tracks clinical trials. It is the best source of information on the studies of the effectiveness based upon clinical trials of different treatments for covid. However, it is more than this - as it is a model for how clinical trials should be communicated to the public so the extraordinarily corrupt medical establishment does not control the information. And it is the website that the medical establishment would like banned from the Internet.

One of the things the C19Early website showed was that early treatment significantly impacted the outcomes against covid.

The Benefit of Early Treatment

Notice that the earlier the treatment is used, the better the outcomes. Naturally, early treatment is measured in days with a respiratory disease like COVID-19, while in months with a disease like cancer. So the timings are different, but the principle is the same. 

Even though this website does not track cancer clinical trials (unfortunately, no website does), the site holds essential observations. For one, a person's response to covid is like their response to cancer, greatly dependent upon the strength and health of their immune system.

Things like Zinc, Ivermectin, and Fenbendazole all empower the immune system and are, therefore, effective in the treatment and prevention of both COVID and cancer. 

Offering Cancer Prevention as Well as Treatment

What is better than treatment is prevention. For anyone who is concerned with cancer prevention, both a very healthy lifestyle and diet, as well as things like Ivermectin and or Fenbendazole, are things that can be taken both as a treatment and as a preventative. We cover all these topics and the supporting specifics on our subscription website. 

Our Recommended Source of Supply

Our approved source for Febendazole and Mebendazole is Summit Products. This source makes Ivermectin much easier to obtain, and Summit Products developed that subsite only to sell the Ivermectin that passed our bioequivalence testing. (which you can read about here)

About Our Dosage Calculator and More Information on Fenbendazole

The dosage calculator, Fenbendazole sourcing, safety, and more (over 60 articles on Fenbendazole) are accessible at our subscription site.

• We have Fenbendazole dosage calculators based on research studies and for all the different uses of Fenbendazole.
• We are the only web source offering a Fenbendazole dosage calculator in addition to different dosage estimates for different cancer types.
• All of our calculators are easy to use (see our dosage calculator listing). Each person enters their personalized information into the calculator and receives our recommended extensively researched dosage estimate automatically and immediately calculated.
• We also cover the broader problems with dosage calculation in medicine at the article The Problem With Dosage Calculation in Medicine, as this is an issue much larger than for one drug. 

Sharing This Article

Share this article with someone you know by copying this article link and pasting it into your email so they can read the same information.