Why Whites Have to Assert Their Right to Live Around Other Whites

Table of Contents: Select a Link to be Taken to That Section

Executive Summary

Whites need to begin to make the claim that they have the right to live around other whites.
This claim is considered racist, but it is a right all other groups maintain.

Introduction

Whites that want to live around whites are being censored, and many other whites that want this are afraid to say anything for fear of being canceled. Other whites are actively promoting the elimination of white society by pushing for immigration from non-white countries.

Our References for This Article

See this link if you want to see our references for this article and other related Brightwork articles at this link.

Go to top

Standard Elite Video on Afghanistan Refugees

This is a standard video on why the US should accept immigrants from Afghanistan. The world is awash in non-whites who want to immigrate to white countries. And the elite media is always there to explain why non-white countries must accept non-white immigrants.

*Note: The term elite media is used here to mean financially elite, not intellectually elite.

Why Whites Must Stand Up for White Societies and Break the PC Embargo On Race

Just visiting different cities in the US, from Minneapolis to Denver or Seattle, and it is clear that the US is rapidly moving away from being a white society. What else is obvious is how much the US society is degrading because of this. Non-white immigrants have greatly degraded the US. This commentator in this video very obviously does not want to herself live around Afghanistan immigrants. Immigrants who are Muslim and would consider her uncovered head to be a sign that she is a prostitute, or who think you can ride an airplane on the outside and arrive at your destination. Something else this nice Western commentator is also not pointing out is that not only that Muslims are in total opposition to Western Civilization and oppose the participatory government and any separation between church and state.

Why would Muslims, who consider non-Muslim society to be sinful and filled with people who are lower than dogs and pigs, want to move to a non-Muslim society? All Muslims consider themselves superior and to have superior values to non-Muslims. Their stated plan is to make the entire world Muslim. So why help them by allowing them into non-Muslim countries? It seems as if a time machine to go and speak with people in 15th century Spain might be helpful at this point. What did 15th century Catholic Spanish think about taking in Muslim refugees?

What To Do With Afghans?

It is fine to get Afghans out of the country, but why do they deserve to live in a civilized white society. Afghans are highly ignorant, very poorly educated, religious fanatics with a host of terrible ideas in their heads. They have no history of intellectual accomplishment and do not overlap with Western society in the least. Why not send them to a Muslim country, where they are a better fit? How much would it cost to pay Pakistan to accept them? They would fit in great in Pakistan. Zero freedom of speech, lots of Allah, no due process, seems like a perfect fit for them.

Time for a Civil War Between Whites Who Want to Live in Non-White Societies and Those That Do Not

We need to separate between people that want to live around whites and those that do not. I don’t care if whites leave white areas to live in non-white countries — but the problem is that they don’t do this. Their answer is to bring non-whites into white countries. This female commentator is a hypocrite. She is not planning on moving to Egypt or Iran anytime soon but wants to bring that culture into the US. It is the white society of the US that has provided her with the benefits that she has.

My message to whites who would support policies to turn all white countries non-white, if you don’t want to live around whites, then leave white areas and go and live in non-white countries. Why not do this rather than lobbying to turn white countries non-white as quickly as possible.

Every country that has gone from more white to less white has precipitously gone done hill. The current problems in South Africa are often blamed on the “legacy of apartied.” However, South Africa was better for everyone and better managed under apartied. How can you recover from something that was better when it was in place? This truth is unmentionable; however, it is provable true. This is not to support any repression of black during the apartied regime, however, the whites in South Africa did not need the blacks to be successful.

The Effect of Continual Illegal Immigration into South Africa

Blacks would not stop streaming into the South Africa from neighboring countries, to once again, take advantage of a society that no black society has ever been able to build. Think about that for a moment. Blacks were streaming in illegally from neighboring African countries into a country that was supposedly terrible under apartied. Why would blacks choose to live in a “racist” apartied state, when they could have stayed in black-run countries? What could the answer be? I am sure if you think long enough, the answer might become apparent to you.

This ever-growing population of poorly cultured and educated blacks from neighboring countries meant that harsh methods were necessary to control the population. That is part of the repression that was part of South Africa was due to uncontrolled immigration. South Africa and neighboring Namibia and Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) (other white-run countries) were the best places to find jobs in all of Africa. Of course, perhaps this had nothing to do with the countries being white-managed and was just a coincidence.

Now the white population is in continual decline, and the African population continues to grow. And under black political control, South Africa is approximating the competency of other black-run countries in Africa. What is surprising about this outcome?

The Outcome for the US as it Transitions to Being a Non-White Country

Since the US began its anti-white immigration policy in 1965, every country’s health statistic (educational performance, corruption, infant mortality, etc.), including very drastic income inequality, has declined. The US now has income inequality at the level of Haiti and wealth inequality at the level of El Salvador. The US is not even sustainable environmentally, with a population of 330 million. However, the only topic of conversation is how we can allow for more refugees (who are always non-white) and more immigration.

“Come Into My Country, But Don’t Live Around Me, Live Around Lower Income Whites”

We have a large number of whites who are elite and live in mostly white areas, turning the country non-white. These whites are never seen looking for “diverse” areas to live in. In the US, whites, along with non-whites, seek to live around whites and in white areas. Whites don’t admit this, but their decisions about where to live tell a very different story than the story they speak.

What Must Be Asserted by Whites

Whites deserve to live without non-whites, in fact, any group deserves to live around its own people and with its own values. It is not denied to other groups, so why is it denied to whites. If diversity is such a global virtue, why isn’t Nigeria becoming more Swedish or Japanese? If someone says that Nigeria should be for Nigerians or for blacks, no one would bat an eyelash. It is taken for granted. But if a white society declares it is for whites, all of a sudden this is categorized as white supremacy.

There are just a few all white towns in South Africa with a total population of just a few thousand. However, blacks have tried to make these towns illegal, even though there are many all black towns. Why would blacks care about a few all white towns? It is obvious. Blacks know they have to parasitize white areas to improve their condition. All non-whites also inherently know this. This is why they make a massive issue around whites living by themselves and have stigmatized it. This is a primary reason that non-whites have weaponized racism. They need to get into what whites build, becuase what they build is not as good. Therefore, if you can’t reproduce it yourself, you need to see if you can get access to what some other culture was able to create. If not, you will only be left with what you can make, which of course is unacceptable to non-whites.

Many blacks have stated that all white success is based upon non-whites. However, there have been many societies, such as Swedish or Norwegian that never had any substantial colonies. If you have a 100% white society, and your society does well, then do you still have white privilege? Non-whites are obsessed with bringing down white privilege. However, this means taking the benefits of white societies and reallocating them to themselves. And then secondarily, distancing themselves from the liabilities of non-white societies. In this view, non-whites, not whites, are deserving of the benefits that whites create.

What is the Plan

Non-whites must associate and infiltrate white societies, and then claim both discrimination and that the societies whites built are actually built upon them, not whites. This is why non-whites have been so aggressive in rewriting white history.

According to the BBC, blacks were all over England in its history. Did you know that Queen Elizabeth was black? Yes, these things have been hidden from us by an enormous conspiracy, which has only just now been discovered.

This preposterous history is what happens when non-whites societies become infiltrated or invaded. The invading group simply makes up the fiction that the country was always their race.

This video shows a Muslim woman claiming that the founding principles of the US are actually based in Islam. This is a curious claim, and Islam is in direct opposition to everything from religious freedom to freedom of speech. However, this is part of a pattern of non-whites infiltrating white countries, and then making false claims about their involvement in them. In each case, the claim is made about a “revelation” that has somehow been hidden from history.

Here is another problem with immigrants from non-Western or white societies. They do not agree with the Western concept of objective truth. Their assertions are merely meant to be made, but without providing evidence. As the US and other traditional European-based societies become less European, the average honesty level of the citizenry declines. For example, India and Asia overall contribute very low levels of intellectual property and do not have reliable research institutions or research publications. The Middle East or Africa have none. Any conclusion can be purchased in any of their journals and their conclusions are not reliable. In the Arab or Indian culture, not lying is not even recognized as a goal. These are the cultures that have been and are being subsidized by NGO’s, think tanks, and private trusts and multinationals. The 1965 immigration act of 1924 intended the country to be ethnocentrically European.

These are not harmless or innocent claims. Non-white immigration is about stealing the benefits of white societies from whites. Fake history and the “bitch slapping” or whites by removing their freedom of speech and controlling their opposition to their replacement is all part of the same non-white plan. The BLM act of pulling down white monuments on trumped-up charges (Grant and Lincoln’s monuments were also torn down).

Their message is clear, and it goes something like this.

Your history is corrupt, our history is pristine. We will define your history, and redefine ours. We will use false claims and what we want to be true, rather than what is true.

All of these things are signals that whites are losing control over the countries their ancestors built.

Why the US Was Successful

The US began as a nearly entirely white country (outside of slaves, which were a huge mistake to bring over).

In my adult life, I don’t ever recall meeting an immigrant for whom I thought it was a good idea to bring into the country. Secondly, these immigrants are massively discriminatory towards out groups. The behavior of Indians (brown, not red) in the US is a perfect example of this.

Immigration Policy Madness

The current immigration policy is madness, and it only began in 1965, but it has been accelerating. As the US is increasingly viewed as a diverse country instead of a white country, the US immigrant population has exploded. I don’t need to view the statistics, and it is very obvious from just traveling the country what is happening. It is a mad dash by non-whites to get into white countries as soon as possible. These immigrants are dangerous to whites because whites (excluding places in Russia or Ukraine) normally create high-trust societies. These societies are easily exploitable by non-whites. Standards of behavior in the US have cratered as such a high percentage of these non-white immigrants have poor or unethical behavior. The white culture is no longer dominant, but instead, it is now accepted for all immigrant groups to speak their own language.

Now virtually every immigrant to the US is not white and has no cultural overlap with the US concept and original design. Does anyone question why nearly all immigrants to the US now are not white? Isn’t that a bit odd? Well as the US becomes increasingly non-white, we won’t have to worry about white immigrant applicants, as there will be far less interest in immigrating.

The US was successful because it was a white culture, not because it was based upon diversity but because it was not. This is true of Canada and Australia and New Zealand. It looks like non-whites are immigrating to white countries because their countries and their cultures cannot replicate white society.

What other explanation is there? North Asians are known for scoring well on IQ tests. However, has any North Asian country ever matched white-based and run countries? Apparently not, because while the desire to immigrate from even successful North Asian countries (South Korea is one example) is very high, while the desire to immigrate from white countries to North Asian countries is virtually non-existent.

It is horrifying to see what the US has become and what is awaiting the country in the future. A country filled with people with nothing in common, who do not agree on foundational principles, with a non-white population that is aggressively hostile to whites and white interests and that is only in the US for what they could get from the country. The founding fathers would be shocked to see the racial groups we are allowing into this country.

Conclusion

This call for accepting Afghanistan refugees is just another in a never-ending attempt to see the answers for global problems to treat the United States as the world’s release valve. During the female commentator’s statement in the first video from The Hill, the obvious topic was brought up of moving Afghanistan refugees to a Muslim country. The answer is that no Muslim country wants Afghanistan refugees. Even a wealthy Muslim country like Saudi Arabia would do nothing more than put their Muslim “brothers” up in the slave accommodations that all manual laborers in Saudi Arabia receive.

Wave after wave of non-white immigrants have penetrated the US immigration system, and with their birth rates, pushing the US to be a non-white society, and this is ruining the habitat of the US for whites.

A great part of one’s opinion on this has to do with one’s own wealth. If one is wealthy and does not have to live in diverse areas (and perhaps can benefit from cheaper labor and the union defeating aspects of “diversity”), one will tend to support WOKE immigration. However, if one is not wealthy, then one will tend to oppose immigration. But there is an important distinction in how much the views of each group are expressed and communicated.

This first group owns the US media system.
This second group does not have an outlet, and also self-censors due to the elites determining that being against non-white immigration. And secondly that the conversion of the US (and all-white countries incidentally) into non-white is not an acceptable view.